76
on the termination of Martial Law, to indemnify parties who had acted in furtherance of it.
I have considered whether the cohesion of this Colony by the civil government is still insufficient to pursue the fear of imminent danger, and whether recourse might be had to the proclamation of military law.
It is initially objectionable to Jurisdiction in that an ordinance allowing the ordinary Courts to exercise jurisdiction to the extent to which they are competent. For the hint that this is worth my expedient, I have had it augmented by suggesting that it constitutes all the authorities not bringing Chipamen, and which the danger was operative & periling, it would fortify the office to furnish military Courts from being confused with Civil Courts only.
I transmit a copy of a despatch disliking the imposition of martial law in effect in Beyton in 1849, and also an ordinance passed on the jurisdiction of martial law, to indemnify parties who had acted in pursuance of it.
76
on the termination of Martial Law, to indemnify parties who had acted
furtherance it.
ni
Thave. Fr.
1
If the Hohesion of this Lone by the tool formoment is still insufficient to pureuse the feare
1
the smoment for inteirent danger, recourse augth Wetad
to the poutanation of militan
is martial / a mon (amon
4
military law.
ao
Jerteh
A
lep
itiall
djectionals Juriasure in
Non at an ordiname alluring
The ordinary
Curs
1
the story to
The extent to just an catent
as Utat lehen me. For the hint
X
Refer have this is wochst,
my Expedient hused hand
b
augment
by Suething
Un avid faves, such
han
spil constithe all the anthe
usidents not bring Chipamen. and unlch the dangu
wen
my
Opere & perfing, it wißt festetten woffice to furtains wilitary
Cows from reused to emrise Cans
only.
I trammit 4
soy da
pontandis fe higing disliken
Virging martial law int iffat in beyton
in 1849, and also
an adiname
Jan
passed on the Jeriscion of martial
Cow, to indemnity parties who his acted in purkuams of it
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.